skip to main content

Experimental Methods (EGR 342), Fall 2012. Study of the Effectiveness of Aerobars

During this semester of EGR 342, students were presented with the following scenario:

aerobars

"You are working as test engineers for Profile Design. Engineers working for Profile Design's product development department have recently developed a new set of aerobars for road bikes. While it is widely believed that aerobars can considerably reduce the aerodynamic drag felt by a road-biker, leading to an improvement in bike speed, the improvement has not been quantified. The marketing department at Profile Design is planning to submit a 2 page article to next month's "Cycling" magazine, proclaiming the revolutionary and cost efficient speed gain that can be achieved by adding these $70 aerobars to a standard road bike. Your project testing team has been tasked with the design, execution, and analysis of a reproducible experiment to quantify the speed gain observed by recreational bikers that typically average 18mph when riding without aerobars..."

table showing power and velocity comparisons.

The students performed experiments, comparing the cycling speed at constant heart-rate for aerobars and regular road-bike handlebars, leading to an average increase in speed of 1.41mph and a standard deviation of σ=1.03mph. Performing a Student-t test, the students showed that the aerobars resulted in at least a 0.546mph increase in speed at a 95% confidence level. Further, students were presented with test results obtained using a power meter at different velocities, as shown in the Figure. Using the theoretical relation between power and velocity

Velocity Equation

Where W is the power, KA is a coefficient based on the drag coefficient, cyclist frontal area, and density (KA=CDAρ/2), V is the cyclists velocity, and F is a force due to rolling resistance. Utilizing this equation, students found a reduction in KA from 0.254 for regular handlebars to 0.198 for aerobars, reinforcing the considerable benefit obtained through a more aerodynamic cycling position.

Final Project

For their final project, students in EGR 342 worked in 2 teams and submitted executive summaries of their studies.

Team one at workTeam 1: Zac Baker, Cody Giles, William Murray, Rainer Pires, Zach Wadley, and Alex Wainscott — investigated the effect of pressure on the performance of soccer balls. Executive Summary of the Project (.pdf)

Team two targetTeam 2: Dylan Baker, Alex Charles, Todd Jones, Taylor Mayo, Grace Morriss — undertook a project entitled: "Take your Best Shot" to determine the shooting position with best accuracy and precision.Executive Summary of the Project (.pdf)

Excellence-Driven Christ-Centered People-Focused Future-Directed